What are we paying for twice?
Map vendor scopes, platform capabilities and internal responsibilities to identify overlap and unused value.
An independent assessment of technology, agency and platform roles designed to expose overlap, integration gaps, unclear ownership and reporting that does not support executive decisions.
For dealership groups evaluating renewals, consolidating vendors, preparing an RFP or seeking clearer performance accountability.
info@dealerperformanceadvisors.com →The assessment is organized around decisions leadership needs to make—not platform activity or generic best-practice scores.
Map vendor scopes, platform capabilities and internal responsibilities to identify overlap and unused value.
Follow data and customer handoffs across marketing, website, CRM, retailing, phones and retention systems.
Separate platform activity from measures that leadership can reconcile to dealership outcomes.
Identify capabilities that perform well alongside gaps that require correction, renegotiation or replacement.
Scope is adjusted to the dealership's rooftops, brands, vendors, systems and decision timeline. Findings distinguish verified evidence, observed risk and items requiring additional data.
Reviewed in the context of the dealership's customer journey, operating model and executive objectives.
Reviewed in the context of the dealership's customer journey, operating model and executive objectives.
Reviewed in the context of the dealership's customer journey, operating model and executive objectives.
Reviewed in the context of the dealership's customer journey, operating model and executive objectives.
Reviewed in the context of the dealership's customer journey, operating model and executive objectives.
Reviewed in the context of the dealership's customer journey, operating model and executive objectives.
Reviewed in the context of the dealership's customer journey, operating model and executive objectives.
Reviewed in the context of the dealership's customer journey, operating model and executive objectives.
Outputs are concise enough for leadership and detailed enough to assign, correct and measure.
Clear evidence, implications and recommended ownership for leadership review.
Clear evidence, implications and recommended ownership for leadership review.
Clear evidence, implications and recommended ownership for leadership review.
Clear evidence, implications and recommended ownership for leadership review.
Clear evidence, implications and recommended ownership for leadership review.
Review a sample structure with finding, evidence, impact, owner and next step—without an invented client or outcome.
The first conversation defines the decision, available evidence, stakeholders and timing.
DPA is positioned as an independent advisor. Recommendations are based on the dealership’s goals, evidence and operating requirements.
Yes. The work can establish requirements, decision criteria and performance expectations before the dealership negotiates or selects partners.
No. Some overlap may be intentional. The assessment distinguishes strategic redundancy from cost and workflow duplication.
Start with one urgent question or combine workstreams into a broader performance assessment.
Independent dealership marketing audit covering media efficiency, attribution, offer continuity, vendors and executive accountability.
Explore service →Executive serviceIndependent dealership website audit covering search-to-VDP continuity, mobile conversion, offers, AI visibility, forms, chat and lead handoff.
Explore service →Executive serviceDealership advertising continuity audit for prices, payments, incentives, VINs, inventory, fees, disclosures and digital retail experiences.
Explore service →Start with one rooftop, one market, one vendor or one executive priority.