Vendor & technology accountability

Turn the dealership vendor stack into an accountable operating system.

An independent assessment of technology, agency and platform roles designed to expose overlap, integration gaps, unclear ownership and reporting that does not support executive decisions.

For dealership groups evaluating renewals, consolidating vendors, preparing an RFP or seeking clearer performance accountability.

info@dealerperformanceadvisors.com →
Questions leadership should be able to answer

Evidence before assumptions.

The assessment is organized around decisions leadership needs to make—not platform activity or generic best-practice scores.

01 / DECISION

What are we paying for twice?

Map vendor scopes, platform capabilities and internal responsibilities to identify overlap and unused value.

02 / DECISION

Where do integrations break?

Follow data and customer handoffs across marketing, website, CRM, retailing, phones and retention systems.

03 / DECISION

Are the reports decision-ready?

Separate platform activity from measures that leadership can reconcile to dealership outcomes.

04 / DECISION

What should be retained?

Identify capabilities that perform well alongside gaps that require correction, renegotiation or replacement.

Assessment scope

What DPA examines.

Scope is adjusted to the dealership's rooftops, brands, vendors, systems and decision timeline. Findings distinguish verified evidence, observed risk and items requiring additional data.

Independent operational consulting. No vendor or outcome is predetermined.
01

Vendor scope and contractual purpose

Reviewed in the context of the dealership's customer journey, operating model and executive objectives.

02

Technology and data-flow map

Reviewed in the context of the dealership's customer journey, operating model and executive objectives.

03

Duplicate capabilities and fees

Reviewed in the context of the dealership's customer journey, operating model and executive objectives.

04

Integration and ownership gaps

Reviewed in the context of the dealership's customer journey, operating model and executive objectives.

05

Attribution and reporting definitions

Reviewed in the context of the dealership's customer journey, operating model and executive objectives.

06

Support and escalation performance

Reviewed in the context of the dealership's customer journey, operating model and executive objectives.

07

Adoption and unused functionality

Reviewed in the context of the dealership's customer journey, operating model and executive objectives.

08

Renewal and RFP decision criteria

Reviewed in the context of the dealership's customer journey, operating model and executive objectives.

Executive deliverables

Built to support a decision.

Outputs are concise enough for leadership and detailed enough to assign, correct and measure.

01 / OUTPUT

Executive vendor-stack map

Clear evidence, implications and recommended ownership for leadership review.

02 / OUTPUT

Overlap and gap assessment

Clear evidence, implications and recommended ownership for leadership review.

03 / OUTPUT

Performance-standard framework

Clear evidence, implications and recommended ownership for leadership review.

04 / OUTPUT

Renewal and consolidation priorities

Clear evidence, implications and recommended ownership for leadership review.

05 / OUTPUT

Governance meeting structure

Clear evidence, implications and recommended ownership for leadership review.

Illustrative framework

See how evidence becomes executive action.

Review a sample structure with finding, evidence, impact, owner and next step—without an invented client or outcome.

View sample evidence →
Executive FAQ

Clear scope. Independent perspective.

The first conversation defines the decision, available evidence, stakeholders and timing.

Does DPA resell the vendors it evaluates?

DPA is positioned as an independent advisor. Recommendations are based on the dealership’s goals, evidence and operating requirements.

Can the assessment support an upcoming renewal or RFP?

Yes. The work can establish requirements, decision criteria and performance expectations before the dealership negotiates or selects partners.

Will every overlapping tool be recommended for removal?

No. Some overlap may be intentional. The assessment distinguishes strategic redundancy from cost and workflow duplication.

Driven by results

Bring the decision. DPA will help establish the evidence.

Start with one rooftop, one market, one vendor or one executive priority.